We are discussing A Judge in Arizona Will Examine Kari Lake Allegations of Election Fraud. Kari Lake has claimed for weeks that her defeat in the Arizona governor’s race was unfair. This week, a two-day trial that will start on Wednesday will provide the former television anchor her long-desired chance to present her case to the judge.
She will have the opportunity to examine ballots, summon witnesses, and present evidence to establish that she is the legitimate winner of the contest, which Democrat Katie Hobbs won by a little over 17,000 votes.
She has abysmal chances. Judge Peter Thompson of the Maricopa County Superior Court stated that she had to demonstrate not only that there had been wrongdoing but also that it was done with the intent to thwart her victory and led to the wrong lady being declared the victor.
At a Tuesday’s gathering for the right-leaning youth organization Turning Point USA, Lake declared: “We have a chance to show the world that our elections are corrupt, and we won’t accept it any longer.”
You might also think about:
- Lake County is Now Classified as Having a Medium Covid-19 Community Spread
- Most of Salt Lake County’s Property Taxes Are Going Up, Details You Need to Know Right Now!
No jury is present. The evidence will be considered in Thompson’s decision, which the losing party will probably appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court. In Maricopa County, Lake requests that the judge declare her the winner or order a new election. On January 2, the new governor takes control.
According to Hobbs’ attorneys, the trial will be a show and a chance for Lake to promote ludicrous claims about rigged elections. Attorney for Hobbs Abha Khanna urged the judge to throw out the entire case before the trial, saying, “The court should not encourage this kind of a performance that plaintiffs want to put on.” A theatre is not what the court is.
Thompson dismissed eight of the ten accusations Lake made in her lawsuit on Monday. This included Lake’s claim that Hobbs and Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer engaged in censorship by flagging social media posts with inaccurate election information for probable removal by Twitter.
Additionally, he denied her accusations of Republican prejudice and the legality of mail-in voting. Although former Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, who selected Thompson to the bench, did not express an opinion on the merits of Lake’s two remaining claims, he did write that she is entitled to present her case under the law.
Lake, who made the election lies of the former president of the United States the focal point of her campaign, was one of the loudest 2022 Republicans pushing them. While most other election skeptics around the nation renounced their positions after losing their contests, Lake has not.
She has concentrated on issues with the ballot printers at a few polling locations in Maricopa County, where more than 60% of voters are registered. The flawed printers created ballots too faint for polling on-site tabulators to read. In several areas, lines were held up due to uncertainty.
Votes impacted were brought to the more specialized counters at downtown Phoenix’s elections department’s main office. All ballots were tabulated, according to county officials, and everyone had a chance to cast a vote.
There may have been a problem with the fuser, which warms the toner to imprint it on the paper, according to reports from officials who stated they are looking into why some printers with the Oki brand failed when used with the identical settings as in previous elections.
Lake’s second allegation is that a contractor who scans postal votes to get them ready for processing at an off-site location violated the chain of custody for those ballots.
She asserts that employees at the facility returned their mail ballots by throwing them into the pile rather than replacing them using proper procedures. There is no paperwork to prove the transfer of votes.
The county disputes the claim. Lake will need to provide evidence that individuals purposefully interfered with taking the election from her and were successful for both the printer and chain of custody accusations.
Nearly a century ago, the Arizona Supreme Court declared that errors by election officials, no matter how serious, do not suffice to annul an election; the losing candidate must demonstrate the errors impacted the outcome.
Meanwhile, a conservative Mohave County judge on Tuesday permitted Republican Abraham Hamadeh to move through with his lawsuit contesting the outcomes of the attorney general election, which he lost to Democrat Kris Mayes by a margin of 511 votes.
In his case, Hamadeh raises the same printer-related concerns as Lake and claims that the inappropriate handling of ballots—duplicated or decided by humans because tabulators could not read them—affected his campaign.
Before a Friday trial, Judge Lee Jantzen ordered Hamadeh can examine votes in the counties of Maricopa, Pima, and Navajo. The results of the race’s automatic recount were supposed to be made public on Thursday, but that date has been postponed pending the outcome of Hamadeh’s complaint.
This may be of interest to you:
- While Many Election Claims Are Denied Kari Lake is Granted a Trial
- Coroner Identifies 24-year-old Woman Found Dead in Lake County Jail Cell
If you find the information presented here fascinating and want to find out more, please return to this website regularly to check for changes. Please visit lakecountyfloridanews.com if you are interested in obtaining background information or answers to any questions you have posed about this topic.